Summary
Attackers replaced legitimate transactions with fake ones, then waited for users to approve higher fees. At least one person lost bitcoin before developers patched the flaw.
Attackers replaced legitimate transactions with fake ones, then waited for users to approve higher fees. At least one person lost bitcoin before developers patched the flaw.
Source & full coverage: this summary is aggregated from CoinDesk, the original publisher. Read the complete report for full context, data and quotes.
Read the original report at CoinDesk →